" Hundens drifter i forsvarsarbeid "
Helmut Raiser's View on Which Drives Are Useful During
Protection Training:
Prey-drive, defense-drive, fighting-drive, etc. are the
catch phrases of
modern protection training. They are thrown around at every
seminar we
attend, they are the subjects of countless articles, but
rarely do people
agree on what is being said about these "drives." About 20
years ago
Helmut Raiser revolutionized Schutzhund protection training
by identifying
which inborn motivations (drives) are stimulated in the
different phases of
training. He did not just assign specific names to these
motivations, he
combined years of practical experience and research with
the clinical
studies and their results of such behaviourial giants like
Brunner, Hediger,
Lorenz, Most, and Trummler among others, to determine on a
scientific level
what drives are and how they fit into protection training.
Without any
further introduction, let me summarize his findings from
his now famous book
Der Schutzhund.
Prey Drive
Prey drive is part of a dog's food gathering behaviour. In
a predatory
animal that means prey drive governs hunting and killing
techniques.
Chasing, flushing, pouncing, biting, and shaking-to-death,
are the most
important of these techniques when we are talking about
protection training.
In order to stimulate these instinctive techniques in the
dog, we have to
keep in mind what a real prey animal does when it is hunted.
Prey is
always on the move, it always moves in an evasive fashion,
and it is
panic-stricken. These behaviours in turn trigger pursuit,
pouncing, biting,
pulling, and shaking-to-death in the dog. Prey drive is
inborn, and is a
trainable instinct, meaning it can be enhanced or reduced.
Prey drive can be
exhausted, meaning that a time will come when the dog "doesn't
feel like
performing the desired behaviours any more." Author's note:
Considering the
serious effects the end result of this drive would have on
a prey animal, I
do not subscribe to the idea that prey work is only a silly
game.
Defense Drive
Defense drive counts as one of the dog's aggression
behaviours, and it can
appear in conjunction with other behaviours. Threatening,
staring, and
biting are typical defensive reactions. Defense behaviour
is generally
triggered by threats, real or perceived, or open
aggression. The goal of
defense behaviour is always to create avoidance behaviour
in the threatener.
Defense drive may appear as defense of prey, defense of
puppies, defense of
territory, defense against the unfamiliar, or self-defense.
The drive is
satisfied in each case when the aggressor shows avoidance
behaviour.
Defense drive is not subject to exhaustion, so it can be
activated at will.
It should, therefore, be part of the combative behaviour of
any protection
dog. Furthermore, it is responsible for behaviours like
countering when
under stress or when threatened. The great danger when
working a dog in
defense drive is that the same stimuli which cause defense
behaviour also
cause avoidance behaviour. Which of the two possible
behaviours is
displayed by a dog when a trigger stimulus is presented is
dependant on a
variety of factors, among them confidence and temperament
of the dog as well
as the threatener, "life" experiences of the dog, age and
maturity of the
dog, location (unfamiliar or home turf), distance between
adversaries, and
the presence of other external influences (prey, mate,
puppies). Author's
note: Hopefully this allows people to see defense for the
double-edged sword
it is. Defense is one part of protection training. The idea
that good dogs
should only be worked in defense is a dangerous one which
has wrecked many
great dogs.
Aggression Drive
Aggression behaviour contains reactive aggression (defense)
as well as
active aggression (social aggression). With all the
different theories that
exist about aggression, there still is no conclusive proof
available as to
whether or not genuine spontaneous aggression exists. The
three theories
about where aggression comes from are:
- Aggression is learned.
- Aggression is created by negative experiences.
- Aggression is inborn.
The truth is probably that aggression results from all
three processes.
Research is available to support all three theories. For
our purposes
however, we should concern ourselves less with where
aggression comes from
and more with what triggers it, what its goal is, and what
its biological
significance is. The triggers for reactive aggression (defense)
was covered
under the previous heading. So, lets deal with active
aggression. It is
always intraspecific, meaning social aggression, and is the
result of
competition over things (territory, food, mates, etc.).
Intraspecific
aggression is activated by rivals, and by anti-social
behaviour. The goal
of the drive is to cause avoidance, submission, or worse of
the rival.
Biological significance is the even distribution of a
species over available
land to reduce the possibility of food shortages and
epidemics as well as
survival of a species and a pack by selecting the fittest
animals for
reproduction and as leaders. In species with a social
hierarchy behaviours
developed from the aggressive drive, which limit the
negative results and
guarantee the positive results of social aggression such as
threatening,
dominance, submission, and rituals of non-physical combat.
Aggression increases through maturation and practise. It
can also be
increased or decreased through training and through
external influences, for
example pain can be aggression stimulating. Other factors
which affect
aggressive behaviour are location and hormone levels. Two
factors which
affect aggression that a protection helper needs to be
aware of are:
personal acquaintance blocks aggression; and passive
acceptance of a dog's
aggression impresses a dog deeply and causes unsureness.
!!!!!! A negative side effect of aggression in dog training
is that it
greatly
reduces the dog's learning ability.!!!!!!!
Author's note: We all want to see our dogs work
aggressively against the
"bad guy," but we need to keep in mind that that is the
final picture we
want to see. Too often high quality dogs don't reach their
potential
because their owners want to see them aggressive right from
the start,
forgetting about the fact that the dog has to learn many
intricate exercises
before he can walk onto the competition field. So if
possible teach the dog
an exercise first, then make him perform it aggressively.
Fighting Drive
Again the question of whether or not an independent
fighting drive exists
has not yet been answered. Some dog-experts feel that a
fighting drive must
exist and that it is related to the play drive. The term
fighting drive is
an oxymoron. It combines the word drive refers to an
inherited trait which
serves to preserve life and species, with the word fight
which refers to
physical combat. A drive to fight would then be an internal
motivation
which leads the animal into a potentially harmful
situation. But even in
social aggression the non-physical ritualistic showdowns
are much more
common than the injurious physical fights. However, that
argument aside,
the term fighting drive is a useful description of a
desirable behaviour in
the dog. We want to see a dog who has fun fighting with the
helper. But
only a dog who doesn't feel like he is fighting for his
life can be
unstressed and have fun. Therefore I (Raiser) feel that
fighting drive is
an extension of prey drive.
What qualities make up good fighting drive - meaning the
spontaneity?
Practical experience has shown that dogs who work primarily
in as a result
of their defensive drive may still lack fighting drive.
Dogs like that then
often fail to engage the helper if he does not present any
defensive
stimuli, but work confidently while under threat. The
desire to "seek the
fight" is an essential ingredient of fighting drive. In all
dogs with
pronounced fighting drive, I also found pronounced prey
drive. Making prey
is a passionate activity which does not stress the dog.
However, prey drive
alone is not equal to fighting drive, the dog also has to
use defense
behaviour. The fundamental component of fighting drive is
the active part
of the aggressive drive, social aggression. Therefore, the
dog must always
see the helper as a rival. The object of competition could
vary: it could
be the prey (hence the relation to prey drive); or it could
be social rank,
which works well with dominant dogs. So in order to
increase fighting
drive, we have to promote prey drive, build up defense
drive, and strengthen
aggression by teaching the dog that he can defeat and
dominate the helper.
This should make it very clear that as much as fighting
drive is a very
desirable quality, one cannot expect to see it fully
developed in a one year
old dog.
Author's note: Do your dogs a favour and help them develop
all the
components that make up good fighting drive, rather than
waiting until it
magically appears out of thin air because the dog should
have "it"
naturally.
What impresses me about the discussion of drives every time
I read Helmut
Raiser's book is that he simply dissects the material on a
scientific basis.
He does not try to make the theory fit his practical
techniques, on the
contrary he willingly admits to his own past mistakes, and
tries to improve
his practical skill by better understanding the theory
behind it. I will
probably summarize the practical applications of these
theories at some time
in the future. For people who can't wait, the full length
version is
available in my translation of the book Der Schutzhund.
part 3
Copyright© All rights reserved.